AD integration in Savvion

Posted by riteshpareek on 03-Feb-2011 06:40

Hi All,

I am new to savvion. I need to implement ad integration

in savvion authontication. Please guide me regarding this.

I configured conf/umacl.conf file with

ldap.ssl=false adAdminusername

Any help will be appriciate. If there any tutorial link ect?


All Replies

Posted by riteshpareek on 03-Feb-2011 23:51

I  have configured almost everything but still getting confused for following entry

#    LDAP user name
#    User name to connect to LDAP server. for example, uid=ebms, ou=people,
#    ANY
# sAMAccountName=******, name= ******, CN=*******,OU=*********,OU=***********,DC=***********,DC=COM

getting following bind exception, which means username/password not correct.

Caused by: java.rmi.ServerException: RemoteException occurred in server thread; nested exception is:
        >> SERVER (id=309c05eb, host=*************.COM) TRACE START:
        >>    java.rmi.RemoteException: ; nested exception is:
        java.lang.RuntimeException: LDAP error : javax.naming.NamingException: [LDAP: error code 1 - 00000000: LdapErr: DSID-0C090627, comment: In order to perfo
rm this operation a successful bind must be completed on the connection., data 0, vece ]; remaining name 'DC=*********,DC=com'
        >>       at com.tdiinc.userManager.LDAPRealm.getUser(Unknown Source)
        >>       at com.tdiinc.userManager.UserManager.getUser(Unknown Source)
        >>       at com.savvion.sbm.util.SBMUtil.validateUser(Unknown Source)
        >>       at com.savvion.sbm.bizlogic.server.ejb.BLServerBean.validateUser(Unknown Source)
        >>       at com.savvion.sbm.bizlogic.server.ejb.EJSRemoteStatelessBLServerBean_e586166b.validateUser(Unknown Source)
        >>       at com.savvion.sbm.bizlogic.server.ejb._EJSRemoteStatelessBLServerBean_e586166b_Tie.validateUser(_EJSRemoteStatelessBLServerBean_e586166b_Tie.ja
        >>       at com.savvion.sbm.bizlogic.server.ejb._EJSRemoteStatelessBLServerBean_e586166b_Tie._invoke(
        >>       at
        >>       at
        >>       at
        >>       at
        >>       at
        >>       at
        >>       at
        >>       at
        >>       at$

This thread is closed