New UI - Unique Field Combination & Integer Field

Posted by Meryk on 04-Dec-2015 10:12

Hi, 

I have a unique field combination trigger on an integer field. Basically I want this integer field to be unique but only when it is different from -1. This is why I am using unique field Combination with a condition.

It is working fine, but this is the error popup :

The error is shown twice, here 'My Error Message', and as you can see, there is also the integration name of the field (My-Integer_Field), which we don't want to show of course..

It is strange, I did this same test with another type of field and it is showing the error message normally.(not twice, and no integration name).

Any ideas?

Thank you

Meryem

Posted by Sri Harsha on 09-Dec-2015 23:38

Hi,

I quickly tried this and was able to reproduce.  This comes up only in case of inline editing.

Logged bug (id:28686) for this

All Replies

Posted by Meryk on 08-Dec-2015 11:12

Hello,

Anything on this please?

Meryem

Posted by Anoop Premachandran on 08-Dec-2015 11:18

Can you share a simple app xml where we can reproduce this ?

Posted by Meryk on 08-Dec-2015 11:30

Here you are. 

There are so many other stuff in this app but please just ignore all of it.

Just look at object "ObjectEinss" and field "My Integer Field" in that same object. Try to change it to an existing value and you will get the error.

Thank you,

Meryem

Posted by Mohammed Siraj on 09-Dec-2015 08:51

Meryem, thank you for sharing app.

Have run the same scenario & can confirm that I am getting only one 'My Error Message'.

Have tried it out on the 4.0.4 beta release build.

Can you please also validate against 4.0.4 Beta Release environment?

Posted by Sri Harsha on 09-Dec-2015 23:38

Hi,

I quickly tried this and was able to reproduce.  This comes up only in case of inline editing.

Logged bug (id:28686) for this

Posted by Mohammed Siraj on 14-Dec-2015 10:45

This has been addressed for Rollbase 4.0.5 release.

Posted by Meryk on 14-Dec-2015 11:17

Good thanks.

Meryem

Posted by Meryk on 05-Apr-2016 03:08

Hello,

Has this been fixed now in any of 4.1 or 4.2 please ?

Thank you

Meryem

Posted by Saraswathi Krishnan on 05-Apr-2016 03:39

yes it is working fine in 4.1

Regards,

Saras

This thread is closed