Running on Private Cloud. This error is coming from a customer instance with Mysql as the DB The error occurs when doing a search. Object Definition 114222254 is User.
I dumped and text searched the entire customer database and am not even finding a reference to 128337216 except in the error log.
Search is not functioning due to this error.
Note: I restored this customer from a Hosted Cloud Instance.
Cause? Solution?
I rebuilt the relationships, updated all the formulas and triggers, and even restarted the server - all to no avail.
As a last ditch effort, I went into the View Page for the initial object and its related objects, added a tab, and moved in all the relationships into new sections. For whatever reason, this fixed the error and I can search again.
Not a clean resolution and it cost a full day to resolve.
Most likely you have mismatch between Object name and record's ID.
Ok - but how to resolve it? I would have expected to find the 128337216 reference in the database somewhere.
The search error is happening on ALL object searches (but not with MetaData search).
I have already run Maintenance and Re-Index.
I even searched the original restore data and it wasn't there either.
I was able to reproduce this error by setting the value of a lookup field with a record ID from another object. For example, I have related objects A and B, but I assigned a record from object C to the lookup field.
In my case, the value was set using setFieldValue API. The error was fixed by assigning the correct record ID to the lookup.
One possible reason - you're using Formula field with error (Object name does not match Record's ID). Fix that error first.
I've been through every formula, expression and trigger. I did have an issue with this earlier but I resolved it. Is it possible that left some lingering element somewhere that did not reset?
Did that. No errors. I originally caught the error with Generate XML.
Actually, I am finding a relationship issue for the same object. It appears the relationship field in the related objects is missing. I'm working to recreate the relationships and delete the old one to see if that corrects the problem.
I rebuilt the relationships, updated all the formulas and triggers, and even restarted the server - all to no avail.
As a last ditch effort, I went into the View Page for the initial object and its related objects, added a tab, and moved in all the relationships into new sections. For whatever reason, this fixed the error and I can search again.
Not a clean resolution and it cost a full day to resolve.
What's your customer ID? Customer name? I can take a look at your system assuming you're using Rollbase.com cloud
It seems you are updating the relationship field with the wrong ID... instead of Project ID you are using the Approval ID.
There is an article related to your issue.
knowledgebase.progress.com/.../000056475
Regards,
Ricardo
@pvorobie - As I indicated in the first post in the thread this occurred on Private Cloud.
@Ricardo - The relationships were not built with the wrong field. I ended up changing the name of the object and I didn't catch this one change. It created the error - which I corrected - but there was something in the background that did not work after the fix.
Somehow the error resulted in Rollbase removing the Relationship Field in the Relationship only (the field was still available in Triggers). I can only speculate that this also affected the page definition.
What no one seems to be noting in the thread is the complete uselessness of the error message and the fact that it identified an Object ID that did not even exist in the system. What's up with that?
What database are you using? Can you verify if the object definition ID exists in your "rb_obj_def" table? If so, you should be able to identify the object to which the record ID belonged to.
It's a mysql database and, no, the object id definitely DOES NOT EXIST in the rb_obj_def table.
Interesting. Do you still see this error in your logs after your fix? I was able to reproduce this error in my environment and deleting the object also seems to resolve the error.
Yes, after rebuilding the appropriate relationships and deleted the "damaged" ones, and then updated the pages where the original relationships appeared, the error disappeared.