Memory Violation 10.2B08 Red Hat 6

Posted by byoung2735 on 09-Oct-2015 10:26

We are receiving a Memory Violation running a very large ABL procedure. This procedure is doing a read of a temporary table. I can't reproduce it so far in a simple case, but was wondering if anyone had seen/dealt with it before.

This is the final line in the protrace stack -

#28  [0x7d21ed5d] __tls_get_addr@@GLIBC_2.3+0x7d21ed5d  from /lib64/libc.so.6

Thanks.

All Replies

Posted by Garry Hall on 09-Oct-2015 10:48

You should contact Progress Technical Support for assistance. You should provide some context, such as the OE version, and the full content of the protrace file.

Posted by Garry Hall on 09-Oct-2015 10:50

Sorry, I missed the OE version in the title. However, you should still contact Tech Support, as they will be able to give you a more authoritative answer if one is possible.

Posted by Libor Laubacher on 09-Oct-2015 10:51

What are the first 10 lines of the protrace, or rather how does the whole protrace looks like.
 

Posted by byoung2735 on 09-Oct-2015 13:55

Thanks for the responses. I do plan on contacting support, but here is the whole protract stack -

#1   [0x9e7d7d] uttraceback+0x144  from /progress/dlc/bin/_progres

#2   [0x9ea5a3] uttrace+0x13c  from /progress/dlc/bin/_progres

#3   [0x9ea447] utcore+0x103  from /progress/dlc/bin/_progres

#4   [0x458c26] drexit+0x39a  from /progress/dlc/bin/_progres

#5   [0x4be8c9] drSigFatal+0x85  from /progress/dlc/bin/_progres

#6   [0x7d60f710] tfind@@GLIBC_2.2.5+0x7d60f710  from /lib64/libpthread.so.0

#7   [0x453e7b] msgsub+0x496  from /progress/dlc/bin/_progres

#8   [0x45375f] msgfnd+0x410  from /progress/dlc/bin/_progres

#9   [0x452b91] msgn+0xee  from /progress/dlc/bin/_progres

#10  [0x794063] rnbfnxtDoit+0x8f8  from /progress/dlc/bin/_progres

#11  [0x793601] rnbfnxtBody+0x3f0  from /progress/dlc/bin/_progres

#12  [0x7931ad] rnbfnxt+0x253  from /progress/dlc/bin/_progres

#13  [0x79933b] rnexec_entry+0x33b  from /progress/dlc/bin/_progres

#14  [0x79a5ca] rninterpret+0x3b  from /progress/dlc/bin/_progres

#15  [0x7c95b1] rnudfunc_Body+0x4d1  from /progress/dlc/bin/_progres

#16  [0x7caefc] rnudfunc_run+0x23c  from /progress/dlc/bin/_progres

#17  [0x7cbdad] rnudfunc+0xed  from /progress/dlc/bin/_progres

#18  [0x46bc1e] fmE_UDFUNC+0x363  from /progress/dlc/bin/_progres

#19  [0x489a94] fmeval+0x464  from /progress/dlc/bin/_progres

#20  [0x7656a0] rnasgsupersimple+0x170  from /progress/dlc/bin/_progres

#21  [0x79933b] rnexec_entry+0x33b  from /progress/dlc/bin/_progres

#22  [0x79a5ca] rninterpret+0x3b  from /progress/dlc/bin/_progres

#23  [0x609442] umeDispatchEvent+0x1112  from /progress/dlc/bin/_progres

#24  [0x971725] wvRunDispatcher+0x128  from /progress/dlc/bin/_progres

#25  [0x7050fd] iodispatch+0x12a  from /progress/dlc/bin/_progres

#26  [0x4a199a] rnrq+0x10a  from /progress/dlc/bin/_progres

#27  [0x4518ff] main+0x428  from /progress/dlc/bin/_progres

#28  [0x7d21ed5d] __tls_get_addr@@GLIBC_2.3+0x7d21ed5d  from /lib64/libc.so.6

This thread is closed