As I learn how to implement OpenEdge SPA, I find three sources that apparently reference the same interface using three different names.
The document 'SPAInstructions.pdf' that shipped with the OE 11.4 documentation, found at C:\Progress\OpenEdge_114_Doc\src\samples\security names the interface 'IOEHybridRealm' in the interface definition on page 5.
The document 'OpenEdge Application Server: Administration' references the interface name as 'IOERealm' on page 337.
And finally, reviewing the source code in the class file 'HybridRealm.cls' in the local file system (C:\Progress\OpenEdge_114_Doc\src\samples\security\OpenEdge\Security\Realm\HybridRealm.cls), the interface is named 'IHybridRealm'.
Unless I am way off base here, it is apparent when attempting to choose the interface to implement from the New Class wizard in PDSOE that the correct name is 'IHybridRealm'.
It might benefit users if Progress can update the errant interface names in the first two documents named above.
As I learn how to implement OpenEdge SPA, I find three sources that apparently reference the same interface using three different names.
The document 'SPAInstructions.pdf' that shipped with the OE 11.4 documentation, found at C:\Progress\OpenEdge_114_Doc\src\samples\security names the interface 'IOEHybridRealm' in the interface definition on page 5.
The document 'OpenEdge Application Server: Administration' references the interface name as 'IOERealm' on page 337.
And finally, reviewing the source code in the class file 'HybridRealm.cls' in the local file system (C:\Progress\OpenEdge_114_Doc\src\samples\security\OpenEdge\Security\Realm\HybridRealm.cls), the interface is named 'IHybridRealm'.
Unless I am way off base here, it is apparent when attempting to choose the interface to implement from the New Class wizard in PDSOE that the correct name is 'IHybridRealm'.
It might benefit users if Progress can update the errant interface names in the first two documents named above.
Flag this post as spam/abuse.
Thanks Mike! Obviously I failed to search the community before posting... I will try and do better in the future.
Thanks Mike! Obviously I failed to search the community before posting... I will try and do better in the future.
Flag this post as spam/abuse.